Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Todays monitor size |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:31:39 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yadfdHHNBLRuc0N4X4armBhD0FIeenT8m5t0mevhzU=; b=ieBarfPQktXJ46h0oGJXmGYs4vtF9J8yJ80L8iIm5bfAI8O9cGA5HD57csmnnTZ+dl OkAIirk8OCSuZPT4Oa94cRPMCCMofaynWt0av8vM/KeAoLvRhck8/usV9Fgr6vDg8ymu vj5w0X+0O1Szpo3eZ//+bSNk6FrJZx2s5HfChXJoO4ATI1WHHfpMq1t3WhtfkzrTHmIB zJdheemIG5/9e/lbzpWRzsjGdrdi6tBwXyp6h1wztr0HJ8VcPs1Bvz7bcezR8aG4grpw PZ9ot71KE0MGtvVOliTc7UNrRUic2lsvpCF3FKtg/fv+JP6hs/sAPoMpaU9CstEC+vJ+ M18w== |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi all,A few years ago we had the discussion about ideal size for grabber /spectrogram dimensions. The consensus was 1024 pixels horizontal. Would you (all) still vote for that size?Since > 5 years i'm now using a 22'' monitor with a resolution of 1680x1050 pixels. Of yourse it would be much better to have wider images, covering a longer time... I would tend to increase the size to 1600 pixels on at least a few grabber windows. Opinions please. 73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: VO1NA peak 0400-0700 150228, Terry GW0EZY |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Todays monitor size, Markus Vester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 8270 Hz, Paul Nicholson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Todays monitor size, Markus Vester |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |