Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ULF: Ground loop night transmission 3.0

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ULF: Ground loop night transmission 3.0
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:10:49 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=2017; t=1555589450; bh=qAqI6zcLKTdBSQy1ceFG+rKKsARwbd2XGNOoiZpeQ9M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=IwA8Drwk3ZWe3SA/LuIE8pEufbuqi7/yHazDVlC58VPlVmBEGOpdpNJ+IHrPRdUIa qZ+0pAQ4PESB3idVNy/TK3pzTdJc0Z0Tc2bqiA7GqCP47xGRKGqwnuUpQcLc2xmYJ6 P0mhvIOk9PqjYy9p6C0oTPTLWa8hjNeL4yP4u2SMgiCF0BIxM+dexFTQUZFOwcgBDc Ll5KG7wn4Q8BxpDnVPpIhIpQGjupk8MjPoTvqyzEXvy6iQ9P1swx7I2A9Eva0QXH/b W0kFZbhfMu8g5TxOqe3PAGTlubObCQBaIBcaj/ACcCup/M5q3WSTpFE45Zyrzf3E3S 4bj9G6RnmYfww==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv: Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
RR, thanks. Can you say something about the noise (QRM/QRN) situation relative to the recent test at 2970 Hz? Assuming equal noise conditions, the signal could be 3 dB weaker for a message decode. And i calculated a 3 dB weaker signal ( G = 40 * lg(2470/2970) = -3.2 dB).
I remember Jims plot from the email of the 7th, June 2017, attached. Two
markers, showing the consideration that a lower frequency could work
even better than 2.47 kHz on our path? But it's not the best time in the
year to try :-)
Fortunately the SNR is well at IK1QFK. That gives an impression of what
can be expected in ~ 450 km distance.
For a next test at lower frequencies i better concentrate on carrier
transmissions again.
Hmm, looking at that plot, i see that 970 Hz could work 40 dB better
than 2.47 kHz. The plot is based on a constant ERP i guess. At 970 Hz
the signal should be 20 dB weaker than at 2970 Hz, assuming equal
antenna current and equal skin depth (loop size). Maybe we find an
advantage, a higher loop size at that frequency. But even with 20 dB
less ERP the signal would be better detectable than at 2970 Hz?? Or do i
misunderstand something here? If not, then it is worth a try!!! That
would be dreaming^4.

73, Stefan

Am 18.04.2019 10:15, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
Nothing decoded in Todmorden.

> it is 'CFM'.

No significant correlation either, best carrier Eb/N0 -9.6dB.

Paul Nicholson

Attachment: FDTD Plot , updated, (E field), by Jim_2.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>