To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Class D current spikes |
From: | <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:02:16 +0000 (UTC) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.co.uk; s=a2048; t=1551085341; bh=sUpi+Q+DvEPB2qDx1nqgT5dwF2jCy/s+VacN7bvNXY0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=AnKlaeCdonUq+eAGhqyAzUrKmMd5OZ27FfTgBWnxJQTSLwLRTlBQiG93gZ5MAeTL1drL3UVB1hL6lkhAe8dUoI+Mutqw+hA4PqqyKHWVVQV6lQVUYcq7z++32l9kCwjh2pxpmgzmLKUoCCRLmbWK7DtBkC4t2dMTfgFajl6h28STYeuiHYzrh0YF3h3wuXH++riwcBpIxLwlzETbTB2shc5dRt8v/v+M8kzgrjwNsIRgYDq98+FKV4x397V0oK0aV3lFPI3mm52YepvqyHYCZJatDixyo66rj0oXm5ZFI6L2vH+7NK/dEkiTb4XU/zHspZPfNXSnHmbSagUl7puEKg== |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Try using a synchronous keying circuit, only uses a few ics and is reliable. I have used it on a modified Decca 5501 on 136 and a similar tx on 475 with no blown fets even to a short circuit, guard circuit used as in the decca design.
73 Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric NO3M <[email protected]> To: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:07 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Class D current spikes
Andy
This recommendation is all well and good, but seems applicable to only CW where either the operator is manually keying or using computer controlled keying with a constant carrier input. With digi modes (WSPR, JT9, etc.) that do not present a constant RF input, the traditional PTT signaling is of no use as it keys active prior to the RF envelope start and goes inactive after the RF envelope ends. The spikes would still be present and problematic. Other than Rik's suggestion of killing the lingering active high driver output, it seems that only using a supply control scheme (whether driver or FET drain supply) would require sampling the original RF input to detect the end of the envelope and apply the key up (inactive) signal. Prior to reaching the driver subsystem, the input RF would need to be delayed by some amount. 73 Eric NO3M On 2/24/19 9:41 AM, Andy Talbot wrote:
For
on-off keying of a switch mode PA you really should be using
supply line control. Switching the drive then trying to
reduce rise /fall times for keyclick elimination by
controlling drive amplitude(something that seems to be done in
some designs) is really asking for trouble. Even
hard-switching drive gives its problems , as we see here
repeatedly
Instead,
why not a simple emitter follower in the positive supply, then
you can apply waveform shaping to the base drive at low
current, where you've got full control. Even a 20A supply
could be controlled this way with a suitably rated
transistor. Quite likely have to be a Darlington. There
will be a slight fixed drop across it, say 1V at saturation /
full power, so a few watts of dissipation, but it's only
operating non saturated for a short period during the rise /
fall times.
A power
FET could be used, but you'd need a drive voltage Vgs higher
than the supply, albeit only a few mA capability; nothing a
small switcher module couldn't manage.
Andy
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Class D current spikes, Eric NO3M |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: 8269.997 Hz, Riccardo Zoli |
Previous by Thread: | VLF: 8269.997 Hz, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | LF: Towers at LF antennas, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |