To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | R: Re: R: LF: MF WSPR |
From: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:42:36 +0100 (CET) |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello Roelof, thanks for the feeback! so I have not to plan a QTH change ;-) In case will plan to move close to the seaside in a warm area thus can enjoy both ham radio and diving :-))) 73, Marco IK1HSS
----Messaggio originale---- Da: [email protected] Data: 5-feb-2019 12.35 A: <[email protected]> Ogg: Re: R: LF: MF WSPR Hello Marco, Your observations agree with what I found in regard to reception of T/A NDB's. Except for Puerto Rico, reception is very poor and northern Canada has been absent as well. On NAVTEX 518 kHz the most consistant T/A station has been Miami. So, yes it is propagation to blame! 73, Roelof, pa0rdt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: R: LF: MF WSPR, Roelof Bakker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: in VK?, Edgar |
Previous by Thread: | R: LF: MF WSPR, [email protected] |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Generating EbNaut from u-blox GPS timepulse - also non-integer Hz, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |