To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test |
From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:00:47 +0200 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1531742452; bh=Is0PS4WhYDQUeBiWHj7lx8uzj67fqSEcGQyihMsrVx4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=hbzQax5ANFcBcMzulk2JYoM3GUaw/fhvg2CCMxko3BjO0ANsuHgqByLiNludNa0qv LY4r8ljKJDC6IW/FPk9IesULcuI1d9YgEaOwlOqC73gjCpKIzBt3YgCZsZkhLLllyU bhjW07qjMj3xCTISZFdpb8J00Hs140a1YrOhE+RZsoKhD3Qv2HJ5ESVSPCxvtOoUm5 3nS4q3B7OpGH94SKO76L67JJfl4NLMG3BjlwDAn7GmiasThqu+G+AkwFCk93eK5Pgm c6IKpg3RpUvcb9Sbd2W4XA+gY2r8GK2O1Ns2exY/TR+YwqckxYvAZVN6q3RLmmG0EL MQj5MSUSy0x3A== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RAyG9K-p416toovkZ5m-N6G_g_Ry8PSdFkHzwHdojW0A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Am 16.07.2018 13:49, schrieb N1BUG: I don't know if this is correct but I read that for optimum S/N one should have 10 dB noise increase on the antenna when compared to a 50 ohm termination. Yes, 10 dB at least, better more.What type of preamp are you using (schematic?). For a comparison with and without antenna, you need to replace the antenna wire with a capacitor of the same C (assume 5...6 pF/m antenna wire, i.e. use 56 pF to replace a 10m vertical) connected to the preamp. If this shows as e.g. -120 dBfs it should show -105 dBfs with the antennna connected. 73, Stefan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Audioinjector soundcard with 12 inputs?, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |