To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test |
From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:51:19 +0200 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1531738280; bh=wz4XtcnkdSHIn+FIu3AsfAcufWui9Pu9VnpYTOOqcTU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=P4yp61Liz3e+X3Fi5lp+6aKBnwni5PmSmZOrkhhDtaHzWb5q0fj9Z3f50oi8WFdGb xiFg/SjZ1E5v9R4zEfSFYO1oQF8ao763JxkrCCuqS1Nsd9OEEgx7437oBqs/PLhezq d/DfADmXY2LeOypSFBOZcmswzEjWXLqJaC1oiAF1/B43KBTs3KJoLsLsDqFTPnrMyN kZ9rw/KnQLyFrqirt9H2vsfwg+N6tBIobgJU9HBfSwop6nvOa7YhKuXKnDpFWOQV8B ZKmyL/PaWej93hpX1ByDECBQg7/yh2EijI8cDjQp4SuTXe+z9HaxlkWswnGj4vdWDG fIPC02S7DcARQ== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RAyG9K-p416toovkZ5m-N6G_g_Ry8PSdFkHzwHdojW0A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Paul, Am 16.07.2018 12:17, schrieb N1BUG: I was planning to build a double size K9AY loop (like W1VD uses) but its 'gain' at 137 kHz models to -55 dBi. It seems to me this puts it at or below the noise output of the little vertical when moved away from the Tx antenna. If that is so, then I will never be able to use it! You will need a preamp for this antenna.The advatnage of a separate RX E field antenna is that you don't need a low Z ground. 200 Ohm for example is OK. So you may use a simple ground rod far away from the house, a CLEAN earth!On the other side, for a TX antenna, you want a ground Z as los as possible. It can be a noisy ground, like the mains earth ground system (in parallel with somethig else). But when the TX and RX antennas are coupled together, your noise may rise, lowering the RX performance. Thus it is better to keep the antennas as decoupled as possible and use a preamp (with an internal low pass or even band pass filter) instead. 73, Stefan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: TX > RX isolation test, N1BUG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |