To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 136kHz - this is how badmy system is! |
From: | Martin Evans <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:51:39 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1516639902; bh=tDToLIbMPzRQZVQX9XFwv9Y1q2A6d8kjpQNwTO5gBQQ=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To; b=JP9+mw0m39xbIoWY+ARdYw0g8UgT9tFY4zIW2CFEYZGsJkyb7y9+B4Pw3LArgnHFoOZ1zfQE+XNLamY8EJL8IWEW7JNOrvx0rtzbE7k6JBL7bSVJlgiozI5JjvHoD8JrQfcUBRbgy20jPteWxUeNIpHChgIKLUAZeTSFak7GgZ0= |
In-reply-to: | <CAHAQVWPuCx+WeejbnDgLMmQRWonYSM4eB8yhs8kRSWe15yhDzA@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAHAQVWP9OQ-dZ0q7hEp2tjuvZzghQGi+oDVBtbwL=xUHCYZi9g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHAQVWPuCx+WeejbnDgLMmQRWonYSM4eB8yhs8kRSWe15yhDzA@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
Watching Roger's adventures on 136kHz, I thought I'd go take a look and I wondered - DCF39 is about 50dB above the noise at 16:44UTC.I'm using a 150ft inverted L, untuned, stuffed directly into an Elad FDM-S2 SDR. Decoded G3XIZ, G4FTC, G8HUH & G4GIR between 16:12 and 16:44. What does this say about my setup? Is it deaf/average/ok? How far above the noise is DCF39 in an optimised "good" setup? Anyone tell me? Martin GW3UCJ Swansea. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | R: LF: GPS locked frequency standard, [email protected] |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: VLF6 (audio stream) temporarily off, Wolfgang Büscher |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 136kHz - this is how badmy system is!, Roger Lapthorn |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 136kHz - this is how badmy system is!, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |