To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: 4470.005 Hz + 4469.9883333 Hz |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 26 Aug 2017 14:13:32 -0400 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1503771213; bh=/zcG8IwchnL/UviDdyUH48ur95lBEiCbx3cpY9UjVRM=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=btjHZ3EQvMULe0YH/shQnKN/nLXDakMWVyfUjUQDT4UH92HlvrjZDy2wcVeNhVHU/ ZdN2jrr4xI/oQ0yEIbYc3XKZyLJqnW4dMVnh2V24hudGrR6BYxhHkD7tnB3DPm/MJ+ yzlBn602CLht9VuaJiMxtBVVtAmF+qwME7UTm3eI= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
There seems to be a peak on the right frequency but not much above the noise. QRN has been building up this afternoon, and I have switched off the carrier now at 18 UT.
Best 73, Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Sa, 26. Aug 2017 14:35 Betreff: Re: VLF: 4470.005 Hz + 4469.9883333 Hz Hi Stefan,
the number entered into the signal generator is 4469.98833330000, i.e. 1/30 uHz below nominal 1/3. Can you tell the difference? If I would go on transmitting forever it would accumulatre to approximately one cycle per year. However in reality it would not, because the phase is pulled back on track by SpecLab's midnight reset. Good traces on the DL0AO grabber already, but reaching Heidelberg will be a much longer shot. I think the minima from your PSK are deep enough, as long as the QRN doesn't activate the noiseblanker too often. Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: DK7FC <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Sa, 26. Aug 2017 13:00 Betreff: Re: VLF: 4470.005 Hz + 4469.9883333 Hz
Hello Markus,
Are you on 4469.9883333 or on 4469.9883333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 Hz ? :-) Sorry, it looks like my nulls in the spectrum are not as low as expected. I would stop my transmission on that band but it looks like i need several more days to reach a proper SNR on Pauls side. Last night has been very noisy again. That leads me to the question if there can be a propagation advantage on 1600 Hz, which triggers the resonator between earth and the D layer of the ionosphere at night? Probably we can't expect much from an E field TX antenna. What will happen? 73, Good luck. Stefan PS: Increased from 150 mA to 155 mA here, about 0.3 dB more, which can already decide between a false and a correct decode Am 26.08.2017 11:46, schrieb Markus Vester:
dk7fc_wald10_170826_1800_small.jpg |
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: RE: Re: Eclipse Experiment, hvanesce |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Carrier on 4470.005 Hz! - EbNaut test, Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 4470.005 Hz + 4469.9883333 Hz, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Carrier on 4470.005 Hz!, Markus Vester |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |