Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Auto-EbNaut reception on LF in JN80

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Auto-EbNaut reception on LF in JN80
From: iz7lsz <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:46:34 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=QOpDHj/NaoPZBDCxVzTQysGIkEmNxb02rtuLx9N3Wis=; b=cM8WZ09MZddEXMEKOPGuTUo7BGkXL31kyKAXxvboAWYDgPibGC5FAK/iPb4VzjV7mk kycTX07R/dve6m3mYnX4yClF/yolL0i9AEFwN1RNbaimn8GEYy38/BVAmRs4a40BS2IN FQEV15EQedIwEsjeoZYsq6C2OrruytQd2uAQCAdG+8e/UXP/PTzllA7mPLCwt9rennut YF+/mv1NkKu8j8Y19wbG99x7OBWCAp0Mm0Ph+eglG1u6ykbV9Vrm3INJ+9PnvUUPCQdu x6f3mNfaxUrkX3KfQv0Zz8vvvTrgmBmuH4ZJ8qiCeG+Zeq7CCIj5KG23q14AhbriXSaQ hOqg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
Hi Stefan,

again thanks for testing this system !

I did some changes and now log is arranged in lifo style. I think is better for browsing now.

About the different list numbers on different channels, it's seem a good idea. I will try to modify the script for the third channel and for the vari-list.

This is the actual sequence of the script :

- exactly at XX.17, after  transmission period,  ebnaut program starts (parameters for RX1) and it ends at XX.31 (about). This time depends from my slow pc.
- after that DETECTED.TXT file is updated and uploaded on my ftp site
- than , exactly at XX.37 ebnaut program starts again  (parameters for RX2) and it ends at XX.46 (about).
- after that DETECTED.TXT file is updated again  and uploaded on my ftp site
There is room for a third decoding process (even at same list=20000)  before that the script loops again at XX.00 hour.

...stay tuned .

73, Domenic iz7slz

BTW this is a very

On 7/5/2017 11:49, DK7FC wrote:
Hi all,

I'm sorry for the many emails today. But i have another idea for Domenico:

You could run a 3rd 'channel', e.g. 137.485 kHz (still oriented on the current frequency section) and indicate/define this channel (3) as a 'local' channel, whereas the other channels are indicated as 'medium' (2) and 'DX' (1).
The difference in the settings in these channels (apart from the frequency of course) is the list size!
Local stations or strong stations like me will decode almost every time at rank 0, so you can use a very small list length for that channel, e.g. 50.
A weak/distant station or in times of high QRN one (e.g. VO1NA) would prefer to use one of the other channels, just in case that the rank will be much worse.
You can see that most of the 'false' decodes happen at list lengths of > 5000. So with the use of different list lengths you can avoid several false decodes, CPU usage and false entries in the log file.
For the 'medium' channel you could use a list length of 1000 and for DX maybe 20000.

Just an idea :-)

Using two frequencies has already improved the situation:

2017-07-05_09:59:30   start time + 30 s  on 137.490 kHz 
found rank 0 ber 8.0645e-02 Eb/N0 10.6 M -9.849675903e+02 [GM ALL IW4DXW K] ps [  1  180  180  180  180]
2017-07-05_10:59:30   start time + 30 s  on 137.495 kHz 
found rank 0 ber 2.3185e-01 Eb/N0 4.9 M -5.360782471e+02 [73 FROM DL TO I] ps [  0    0    0    0    0]
In a few minutes i will try to run less antenna current to come closer to the limit :-)

Thanks for the great service :-)

73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>