Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: hunting IK1HGI on LF

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: hunting IK1HGI on LF
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:31:17 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3v15CJFqLgRvlPYVi2UbwaEGVpGLaN26pqAexV3ezv4=; b=ijb4BfD2D30cfnR0xt+2u8zmpq RNnZAetZmVkSKr5fVKHItcZSqHcgkdoi85SP6iC4tQXjwFtr17hJCAU2OtCAg2EFOqf/+6taa/T3k yyZDhCipGxRpuScEWP1lwJqRZHY4vCTDfz9+XKz0FEdVsY0twZWlMWk0eCyiXGYuSZrk=;
In-reply-to: <CAC+C6w5DEMfnyORiwhJb0uJdZJO4+LBiFCXVhcLf6573vtsn+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC+C6w5DEMfnyORiwhJb0uJdZJO4+LBiFCXVhcLf6573vtsn+g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1

Domenico wrote:

> IK1HGI ...png

Definitely something there.

> vtread -v -T2017-06-22_23:40,+16000 ...
> ... vtnspec -v -f 1493 -w0.02 -r6.25e-5

Will the received phase at LF be stable for 16000 seconds?

If it isn't, the coherent integration will suffer a loss.

Maybe try some non-coherent average.  Example, if you
think the phase is stable up to 30 minutes you could try:

 vtnspec -v -f 1493 -w0.2 -r5.555e-4 -a

The -a averages (non-coherently) multiple 30 minute spectra,
which is where the -r5.555e-4 comes from and I've increased
the -w too.

The log messages show an 'nfinal' which is the number of
spectra averaged, and the output file only has two columns,
so plot ($1 - 1500):2

Maybe you get a better S/N from Tony.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>