Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: New EbNaut announcement...

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: New EbNaut announcement...
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:36:24 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hello Jacek,

Yes i need/like to learn everything about this tool. You can publish it on your website maybe, it could be too much OT here. But i'm starting from 0.000 so i need some very basic stuff at the beginning. I like to learn by myselfe in small steps, not directly looking for complete scripts. I've ever been a lonely fighter, otherwise i wouldn't have done any kite experiment!

I understand that the settings dependency is related to the QRN and QRM. So you can do this only when the EbNaut message is already known, or you need a plain carrier!? But, can't you generate your own carrier by an internal signal generator (even weighted, for a 3 axis system, i.e. a certain phase and amplitude weighting for each channel, known from different messages in the past, i.e. individual for each TX stn) to determine the optimum setting for the individual transmission and its QRN/QRM situation? All this could be put into a script, that calls the recording, adds the weighted test signal, determines the optimum parameters and then applies them to hopefully decode the EbNaut message?

I'm now struggling to decode my own message of the last 970 Hz experiment, so i have a challenge! The spectrograms are already completed...

73, Stefan



Am 10.06.2017 23:15, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski:
Thanks for the transmission Stefan. although this is easy decode, it can be used to optimise the receiver for longer messages.

I've tried to process this using different vtblank -a and -t parameters, use ebnaut in signal analysis mode (knowing thr message in already) and graph the resulting carried Eb/N0. The pipeline is: vtread ... | vtfilter -h bp,f=6470.1,w=3000 | vtblank -aXX -d 0 -tYY |vtmult -f 6470.1 | vtresample -r 240 | ebnaut -r240 -other parameters -d15 -f16 -M received_message. Only the -a and -t parameters are changed. 14 -a values and 409 -t values were used (5726 calculations, about 1 day on 48 intel cpu cores).


The attached graph shows the carrier Eb/N0 for different parameters, and can be used to optimise the receiving of longer messages. For this transmission the sweet spot was -t 7500-8600 (for -a 1.7) and -t 8550-8750 (for -a 1.8), i'd use vtblank -a 1.7 -t 8050 -d0.

Beware that this is specific to qrm at this particular location, time of day, thunderstorm activity etc. Beware2: this is for vlfrx-tools 0.7q (which is unpublished bu Paul, but downloadable by tweaking the url, the official 0.7p works similar), vtblank from version 0.8 behaves differently (haven't checked why yet)

I can publish the scripts and the raw data in case anyone is interested.


VY 73

Jacek / SQ5BPF



On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, DK7FC wrote:

Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 14:41:28 +0200
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: VLF: New EbNaut announcement...

Hi VLF,

For some local tests i like to transmit the 2 character message that i already sent on 970 Hz 3 weeks ago. This time on 6470 Hz....

Such a short message with sch long symbols may be interesting for newcomers or various tests by the established VLF receivers...


f = 6470.100000 Hz
Start time: 05.Jun.2017   13:00:00 UTC
Symbol period: 60 s
Characters: 2
CRC bits: 3
Coding 16K21A
Duration: 9h, 20min
Antenna current: ~ 460 mA

73, Stefan



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>