Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived...

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived...
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 20:18:12 +0100
Cc: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2hcCulZ/NHQPWDDtPBxDURasazgY6YAe5jnjhLtZhyM=; b=PBU69UXW3IGmHOVHRDvoCvfc2d+1NDmu/HeercYWr28fv41FY/Zv0Lk/1NhzqEkobQ 3lg5VKVuDE0sj348sJJYoG8K+nAOjFLdXrYPe/Y1ivNc4GfAo/U2R6FF1HJSacc/3fxG JBlr874sETzs15KBBPirRxLzOemw0JdJUBITAbxj3asnJbI60as+mbjWGisyFI+N/2Xo 6RR+zAm89aWrjeVn5M5A2BMoACu7uDOcHG9hJqICV26iGBp1nvSlraVlgZogxsQUdm+e UqRdIjwJiWeEaYg+50Y8xtnH6DgjDpziX81Ufz8MorQ/KCzzVmyy0oqdjad00YgY6gwI y5yw==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
First thing I noticed is that your turns ratio on the output transformer doesn't look right.   
You quote " ... with primary winding of 15 turns and secondary of 12 turns..."

180V DC in a half bridge is 180V peak-peak square wave.   
The fundamental sine part of that is  4/pi * 180 = 229V pk-pk   
so is 229V /[2.SQRT(2)] = 81V RMS

To a good approximation RMS(fund) from a half bridge is Vrms(fund) = 0.45VDC

For 500 Watts out, Rload =  81 ^ 2 / 500 =  13 ohms

So to match to 50 ohms you need a turns ratio of SQRT(50/13) = 1.9:1     so call it 2:1  Keeping 12 turns on the  secondary means you need 6 turns on the primary

When operating at reduced voltage, the power out will vary exactly as the square of the voltage.   
Recalculating from first principles for a 12V supply:

12V  DC = 12V pk-pk = 12 / [2.SQRT(2)] * 4/pi = 5.4V RMS (fundamental)
in 13 ohms should give 5.4^2/13 = 2.2 Watts

check using ratio of voltages, squared :

(12V/180V) ^ 2 * 500W = 2.2 Watts which is the same as above.
QED

Your 15:12 ratio result sin a load impedance of (15/12)^2 * 50 = 78 ohms

At 40V DC == 18V RMS(fund) that will give 18^2/78 = 4.1 watts  which is actually LESS that you are seeing - the 2* discrepancy is odd, but the low power is in the area of what you measured..

Andy  G4JNT

 

On 28 May 2017 at 19:34, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Chris,

I tried to post this message on the reflector but apparently I had no
success..
As promised I keep you updated but as you can read in the
attachment the first trials were not enocouraging...
Andy, may I ask you to read my report? your interpretation and
suggestion are welcome!

73, Marco IK1HSS


-----Original message-----

From: "[email protected]" [email protected]
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 17:01:33 +0200
To: [email protected]
Subject: For today the FETs survived...

Hi LF,

hope that also the toroids of Chris survived!
My FETs survived, but they are not working as expected :-(
Attached the report on my attempt to duplicate the half bridge of
Andy..
Has anyone suggestions before I try to cook all connecting to the
180Vdc supply?

Thank you
73 Marco IK1HSS


--
This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be
clean.







---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 17:01:33 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: For today the FETs survived...
Hi LF,

hope that also the toroids of Chris survived!
My FETs survived, but they are not working as expected :-(
Attached the report on my attempt to duplicate the half bridge of
Andy..
Has anyone suggestions before I try to cook all connecting to the
180Vdc supply?

Thank you
73 Marco IK1HSS


--
This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived..., Andy Talbot <=