|Subject:||Re: VLF: Tonite...|
|From:||Markus Vester <[email protected]>|
|Date:||Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:14:03 -0500|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1488914044; bh=ylfwV51Qwdwfm/lR5OEJQf8/zOtSkOlp8Lk9/+TIMxA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eqzvMgn/Yrj19pc/gwIWWDE1I43o/nRTyYJ2Ybri+/H+M3UOWv7sPPJe9GRVRR+I3 7evT9Rmqh1gUBgo33dT0qIhcGhyAGFRGcwVfT2dMC0XCueAd/QudqfsxjWtf7KZk91 iuorr7R1ATyY0x5F21kKn5x4VmapP/MzTYRCEPKc=|
>> The 5 uHz offset may come from the fixed samplerate in the sr file. The real samplerate is drifting of course, so there may be very small offsets to the value in the file.
Maybe not. With samplerate lock activated in SpecLab, a samplerate error should not affect the center frequency, and only scale the frequency offset entered into the EbNaut decoder. In my settings, the FFT is usually centered on 8270.0 Hz, so with 0.5 ppm SR uncertainty Stefan's signal at +0.1 Hz might be misplaced by a negligible +-0.05 uHz. However as far as I know, Alex has anyway centered his FFT on 8270.1, so the samplerate deviation has no influence on frequency and phase. Thus the observed 5 uHz offset is more likely due to a gradual change of propagation phase.
Von: DK7FC <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Mo, 6. Mrz 2017 22:01
Betreff: Re: VLF: Tonite...
Thanks for the 2 character decode. Unfortunately my 2nd attempt for the 8 CH message has started to late. And yesterday, the rain was so strong that it triggered the safety function, although the limit was set to -150 mA! I need a waterproof housing for the coil, not only a trash bag. And i need to insert the transductor to compensate at least a drift of 20 Hz or so.
The 5 uHz offset may come from the fixed samplerate in the sr file. The real samplerate is drifting of course, so there may be very small offsets to the value in the file.
When will you be in the garden next time?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|