...another point: I tried to understand as much as possible from
http://abelian.org/ebnaut/results.shtml
16k is convincing.
What about 32K? No significant additional advantage or not practicable
for normal PCs?
Also it would be interesting to see graphs for the message success rate
= f (Eb/No) for various list lengths. In my recent transmissions i'm
playing with the CRC value so that the optimum list length is in a range
of 100000. It would be interesting to see which difference a list length
of e.g. 200000 makes. In my transmission which is running right now,
going from CRC14 to CRC15 would mean a doubling (ish) of the list
length. The transmission time would just have been 6 minutes longer...
73, Stefan
Am 26.02.2017 22:16, schrieb DK7FC:
Hi Paul,
Why is there no mode called 16K19A? Would that combination make no
sense? With messages longer than 12 characters i may come to a
critical value for most EbNaut decoders, so i will need to switch to
8K19A.
Switching from 8K21A to 16K21A has an advantage (using the same
transmission time), as far as i understand...
73, Stefan
PS: Here i'm preparing for transmissions on lower frequencies again...
|
