Hi Stefan,

where do you qsy next? :-) the dreamer band is now no longer a dream ;-
)
are you winding a new coil for 77 Hz band?
gosh.. 3800 km of wavelenght!
Leaving the jokes .. again compliments for the new
achievement, although on the theory there is nothing new I can't avoid
to be still fascinated from the fact that a so small change in one
place can induce a detectable change so far away... it is almost like
the butterfly from the Amazonic forest...
Keep on Stefan we are awaiting for a new detection in a more remote
place, anybody 10 lambda away listening?
73 Marco IK1HSS
----Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 11-feb-2017 23.28
A: <[email protected]>
Cc: "Renato Romero"<[email protected]>
Ogg: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not?

Hi Markus, Paul, Eddie, Marco, Jim, Renato,

thanks for the positive feedback.

Am 11.02.2017 15:22, schrieb g3zjo:
>
> I am convinced, but do it again.
>
Yes, i will do it again on another frequency. Hopefully the QRN stays
low for some time longer. Or i have to add more power! Hmmm, critical,
maybe.

Am 11.02.2017 16:55, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
> 2970 is the strongest line.  At least 3 sigma, maybe 4,
> depending on how you treat the lumpy floor.  A physicist
> would insist on 5 sigma but the fact that the peak is
> at exactly the right frequency is significant in itself.
>
> Markus just wrote:
>
> > In my humble opinion, this is clearly a successful
> > detection.
>
> I was doubtful looking at the spectrogram but having
> plotted the pixels I am convinced.
>
> Best I can get in Todmorden is 2 and a bit sigma
> using just the daytime signal in 3.9 uHz.  Not
> significant at all.  Would need at least another 7
> days of transmission.
How does that peak look so far, in a spectrum? What happens if you put
day and night together, maybe with some phase correction?

73, Stefan