To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: EbNaut beaconing on LF |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Feb 2017 23:34:46 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UoRde7oGOkBtbVYmRsL+YTVkTeDpkaMTtUpDXHAJCwQ=; b=8ikI6aV0iV3dy8M7J0xSWLUGS8 9Fy1V9ZB/SwGvi6pOr1safhbkpoTGkzHI/iEMEnDjqNETWJqnwJR1lumwSk9aBWVsJCuDuIqrLdQ1 +nb5Fo1J87chcJcelQVqSPMLxLixS9jfq8nO3fJjEIU1Ux4odXG0cPZ5RjZednuZS384=; |
In-reply-to: | <CANA3B6XpuoUxSqMRNosTppH6-ScWXOuHsvZncru61MB-TVA24w@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CANA3B6Wnm9-i5hRso+BTV06LqiOYNNB9rE_7_62rD6DQ1NGVrw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6XpuoUxSqMRNosTppH6-ScWXOuHsvZncru61MB-TVA24w@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Riccardo wrote: > in fact the bandwidth on your grabber seems larger > than Domenico's EbSynth test signal. The ebsynth settings Domenico is using produce BPSK where the phase is slewed from one polarity to the other. It takes 0.05 of a symbol period to change phase. This is intended to limited the keying transients of the signal when operating at LF or above (on VLF, hard keying is no problem, nobody will complain about the sidebands - you can just use a relay!). I don't really know how effective that slewing is, ebsynth hasn't had much air time. Reports welcome! I can use some other method to constrain the bandwidth if necessary. Testing a mod to ebsynth to control the PTT via com port modem control lines. It works nicely but for one obscure test case: a soundcard with a long output buffer (eg 5.4 seconds on a AUD 20101 USB dongle) combined with a message which is so short that it fits entirely in the buffer. I have an ugly fix for this case, but the fix would fail if you also set a repeat time so short that more than one message was in the output buffer. The solution for that is uglier still. I'll sleep on the problem and in the morning I will have an elegant solution that handles the craziest combinations of long buffers and rapid fire messages. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: EbNaut beaconing on LF, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | VLF: 700mA on 8270 Hz, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: EbNaut beaconing on LF, Markus Vester |
Next by Thread: | VLF: 700mA on 8270 Hz, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |