To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km... |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:33:22 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QY1FXtCzaYto3FL1V48VcSbXctCiePttXMkdYwFKDjU=; b=hwGYqNC59qfKRqDFRzc0YgniYQ 2oNL1EMehPpNpyuTdOr4AnE348NvGA4ZXfkMqNxMV/SKXHV88kqGESD+KupUmngZ9rHLWVVi0zbcF Z9xIdRGCluQGRNXCxSJe7By6hCRNwL/ynYSoeSHwWUXG6cI1ei8f6qmEr6sRK1M8S0Uw=; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
Stefan wrote: > f = 5170.000000 Hz > Start time: 04.Jan.2017 08:00:00 UTC > Symbol length: 60 s > Characters: 8 > CRC 16 > Coding 16K25A > I will repeat the transmission starting [5th] 8 UTC... Best decode with reference phase pattern: 30 30 0 0 Eb/N0 = +3.6 dB, BER 35.0%, list rank 0. S/N 20.24 dB in 11.8 uHz, -63.0dB in 2.5kHz The phase pattern is appropriate for an advance of the signal phase during day relative to night. Symbol error map (with 30 30 0 0 pattern): http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170106a.png and with constant reference (0 0 0 0 pattern) http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170106b.png Not much difference, 500/1408 symbol errors with constant reference. Down to 493/1408 with 30 30 0 0 pattern. I haven't mentioned the message text because it's possible someone else may be trying a decode. > that makes a fine record of 5.17 kHz successes > between the two of you! Indeed, 5170Hz seems to be quite a cooperative band to use. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |