|Subject:||Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km...|
|From:||Markus Vester <[email protected]>|
|Date:||Mon, 2 Jan 2017 15:00:36 -0500|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1483387237; bh=kMAoDAzEfgOW9qCoqHlzkAC1Trias5W1yPAJIxD3cWo=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HFXwu6vdZnvOeogCnagQcyO+eQvc9Gs/lFYOIHmvq+XdnxlokfVVRHhBcVlEvP02+ 2Bna0eaofI/3e64aJGMIjs3Whn87BmI0F+MnEvC2hU6NjANn1iRXqXYdeMSXqLnuFu T1CHRm2iBmn1NsoTA6GZ/iNVzxk7LylQ2LJjFIwo=|
Thanks Stefan. But I'm afraid it won't work: There was absolutely no hint of your offset carrier in my 63 uHz spectrogram, and also not in another one with 31 uHz bins. Perhaps I was too optimistic about my QRM situation on 5.17 kHz.
If you like, we could try again with another long carrier with offset during the daytime, when noise is lower and there's less propagational phase uncertainty.
Von: DK7FC <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Mo, 2 Jan 2017 6:37 pm
Betreff: Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km...
Let's try further challenges on 5.17 kHz. A first night transmission:
f = 5170.000000 Hz
Start time: 02.Jan.2017 17:00:00 UTC
Symbol length: 40 s
Duration: 12h, 26m, 40s
Antenna current: ~ 200 mA
Markus, would it make sense to try a shorter message in 8K19A with long symbols for you?
I did not see my carrier on 5169.99975 Hz on your grabber though.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., Markus Vester|
|Next by Date:||RE: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., hvanesce|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., Jacek Lipkowski|
|Next by Thread:||Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., DK7FC|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|