To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km... |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:50:37 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1483386637; bh=JNwM5VVrmQuicCjpq3jC2xkDn4YSXlHxIXO8PljVANA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oipyqz2dMQ9cGBVdhY7KtcrmMHXPL0ew7STP6Xof4uqn4a3rdT4lLOKf8p+ZsYVI1 /w//wlxURJcjOZ4+b/UjJV47/UiK+FAtC2RK0yHkM33MZgGGEATbBbb/f4O8sJfQ03 hSdRV9/cy1bVsVEYhP9lBtBmIg6irtGEDVHWdgIE= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
> but the signal is spread across 70uHz for some reason Similar to the Alpha's, SpecLab resets the phase of it's GPS-locked signal generators at midnight. As 86400/4000 = 21.6 is not an integer number, there was a 0.4 cycle (144°) phase step at 0 UT. The discontinuity is clearly visible on Stefan's 424 uHz grabber window. For example, 1.25 or 0.625 mHz offsets would work, but not 0.5 or 0.25 mHz. Best 73, Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mo, 2 Jan 2017 8:21 pm Betreff: Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km... Stefan wrote: > f = 5170.000000 Hz > Start time: 02.Jan.2017 17:00:00 UTC > Symbol length: 40 s > Characters: 5 > CRC 16 > Coding 16K25A > Duration: 12h, 26m, 40s > Antenna current: ~ 200 mA Looks good. Last night the carrier 2017-01-01_17:00,+44800 at 5169.99975 Hz measured 0.135 fT but the signal is spread across 70uHz for some reason. It may decode at Eb/N0 between 3 to 5dB, hard to say. Allowing for perspective I tweaked the building separation to 45m and the height of the service rooms to 3.5m to get 412pF and effective height 13.1m. A little better but still a long way from 480pF. Rrad is about 160u ohms so expecting 6.3uW. LWPC says 0.088 fT daytime and 0.124fT nighttime. Measured: Daytime average 0.095fT, nightime 0.135fT I wouldn't rely on either LWPC or my measurements to better than +/-50% and that is probably generous. But it's nice to see we are in the right ballpark. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., Paul Nicholson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., Markus Vester |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., Paul Nicholson |
Next by Thread: | RE: VLF: Back on 5.17 kHz / 58 km..., hvanesce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |