Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz
From:	Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:04:58 -0500
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1481317499; bh=jJRlkGmB9YAG4VIJ10552UwbSosRZ8zX+zNGu3/vB0E=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nJsCnED0PPOD9AmhpRcByiAm4S7AICUgomyTVHH6jumOSSjwodRTE0a6DbBGAqSRo nBZdSmI9les40ARPAzYYtwLaJLiR2sj0RNLUN/qgbsPFtXe+L7xs5j+8nBDinbB4Xo tq8xB1V16USNjnHB4laQRVn1yzZBzin/9p9nHgBE=
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Joe,

thanks again for the positive report!

Yes that SpecLab configuration from
http://df6nm.bplaced.net/VLF/fec_tests/df6nm_ebnaut_utilities.zip
should basically work for EbNaut. This zip also contains an email text file explaining some details of the procedure.

In case your RX is not stable on a sub-mHz level, you may want to lock to your pilot tone by engaging SpecLabs "Frequency Offset Detector" (not the "Samplerate Detector") on 1500 Hz audio. I would recommend to look into SpecLab's help for a functional description and setup details.

Good luck!

Markus (DF6NM)

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: jcraig <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Fr, 9 Dez 2016 9:06 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz

Hi Markus,

Your signal was readable (without too much imagination) this morning.
Will try for your ebnaut tonight with the DOCXO pilot on 137.500 kHz.
If opds32_150924.usr is used with Spec Lab, this should yield the txt
files to feed to ebnaut?

Cheers
Joe VO1NA

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Markus Vester wrote:

> This evening I'll run some LF EbNaut tests again:
>
> Frequency 137490 Hz,
> 8 characters, 8K19A,
> 1 second symbols (duration 656 seconds)
> start times: 19:30, 20:00, etc, plus 0.3 s transmit delay
>
> Best 73,
> Markus (DF6NM)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, (continued) Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, jcraig Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, jcraig Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester <= LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester Message not available LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Domenico IZ7SLZ Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Domenico IZ7SLZ Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, jcraig Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester LF: Re[2]: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, riccardozoli Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Domenico IZ7SLZ Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Domenico IZ7SLZ

Previous by Date:	Re: ULF: Finally 100 mA on 2.97 kHz / 65 km ULF experiment, David Hine
Next by Date:	LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, jcraig
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]