Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz
From:	John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:39:41 -0500
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1

Mike, Markus,

Nothing seen last night. Another night might include the upstart of theexpected coronal hole flow. Sometimes, surprising things happen.


John, W1TAG

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: AW: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, (continued) Re: AW: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison LF: Best SDR for LF., Martin Evans Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, jcraig Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, jcraig Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews <= Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, John Andrews LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, jcraig Re: LF: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester LF: Re: EbNaut tests 137.490 kHz, Markus Vester

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, jcraig
Next by Date:	Re: ULF: Finally 100 mA on 2.97 kHz, DK7FC
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, jcraig
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]