To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:20:50 -0500 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1480972850; bh=JCxOkDUo59GLljQg5SZesfXoNN3+oJblTMuRyRsdd28=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KVBQfjUo4xEEhVlLNsd5bCkYoa/FxBAAF9d65mD3PWt5Hz8iUy4UUEFXce4LWv7z+ sWpadvjgRY6LXF3V93ET0q0VzKIH8/ixjofzA3IVk69dYA28ySh1hJycH24dAY302s BqMxRHNnWhXnxf8uzmXk3sEYsDVP8WxRfQKYo+Vs= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thanks John for looking! Will try again tonight, same hourly DFCW schedule. Mike, Markus,Best 73, Markus -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: John Andrews <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mo, 5 Dez 2016 2:25 pm Betreff: Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz Nothing seen on 136172.5, but there were some traces on Mike's frequency. The best began at 0500, and you can see the "skeleton" of a complete callsign. John, W1TAG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re[2]: LF: RFI noise at 144 kHz exactly, Chris Wilson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Laurence KL7 L |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Mike Dennison |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: QRSS60 tests on 136.173kHz, Laurence KL7 L |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |