Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:55:23 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Paul, VLF,

That's amazing! I like the 4 uHz peak :-) 18.22 dB in such a small bandwidth, that tell's something about TX and RX stability but also about the path stability. No defeat at all. The (unblanked!!) QRN looks incredibly strong but i find it interesting to try in such condx.
If you are ready for a next transmission, i would start one in a few hours.
Maybe 300s symbols and 13 chars?  Takes just 74 hours! :-)

73, Stefan

Am 04.06.2016 18:57, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

Stefan wrote:

> Message 22.05.2016: 'cqcq dk7fc in jn49ik'

18.22 dB in 4.06 uHz,

 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160604a.gif

which gives Eb/N0 = -2.35 dB on the 20 char message

> Message 25.05.2016: 'not very easy'

16.24 dB in 7.97 uHz,

 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160604b.gif

and Eb/N0 = -2.46 dB.

Seems we are close with both messages, just needs another dB
to have a chance of decoding and another 2dB would make
decode very likely.

These must be amongst the narrowest bandwidth detections anyone
has used.   The day/night phase shift doesn't seem to be causing
us any problem.   But, I wonder if I could gain another dB by
adjusting for a nominal diurnal.   I can use these recordings to
try that.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>