To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Screening an LF Loading Coil |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:37:21 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <DC91D7EF611642ADA1E361BF55CFCFC8@gnat> <[email protected]> <2025D63622D3474489049C563BA6B7AB@gnat> <[email protected]> <CAMFjj71mz43WMxbTrUgUf3rvoHPCL9CVhWF5wxJisGw0Re5Nag@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Alan wrote: > I came across Gerald in the 90s There are at least two other LF list members who also knew Gerald, including a Chris McCarthy that I remember from AFL who I think may be G3XVL. Small world isn't it? Oops, we've well and truly highjacked Hugh's thread here. Back to the original question - the barrel presents a giant shorted turn to the loading coil but that doesn't necessarily destroy the Q, it depends on how well the coil couples power to the resistance of the shorted turn. Coupling to the barrel would reduce the effective inductance of the coil a little and you can test for that by measuring L with the coil in and out. > the Tx output voltage and current are just the same? Then it sounds like there's no problem at all. Lossy coupling to the barrel would raise the AC resistance of the coil and tx output current would have dropped. -- Paul Nicholson - |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: EA in LF soon, VIGILANT Luis Fernández |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: NA & XIL 137kHz (QSY 136.5 CW), Roelof Bakker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Screening an LF Loading Coil, LineOne |
Next by Thread: | LF: Apr 9 - 10 Best QRB/reports, Alex R7NT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |