| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: 8270 March 26/27 |
| From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:40:14 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CD88A568396149928ABB839324A8BC72@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <2D7908E03091413A820A246935576A96@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TbAYES7UgGRq56iqgp+7hb9m0S2m3Ue5cSrPbwKwVhEg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
I ran about four hours of Roland's 8270Hz carrier into the EbNaut decoder and got ** with 38 second symbols at Eb/N0 = +1.5 dB with phase pattern 90 90 60 60 - quite an easy decode. It even decoded *** with 35 second symbols at Eb/N0 = -2.3 dB, a genuine decode because there was no false decode with higher path metric. Phase was 120 90 90 60. Those phase patterns say the frequency was a smidgen low, perhaps due to Doppler. So, EbNaut messages possible using 1uW over 1Mm exploiting a two electron signal. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, uwe-jannsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: AW: Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Paul Nicholson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: 8270: now 8269.990Hz, Markus Vester |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: CW beacon 477.7 kHz, Roelof Bakker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |