Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Sunday Mar 20

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Sunday Mar 20
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:46:33 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1458773199; bh=X9ANNo6ZZShHCIQ1HFvcixVs3HSf/9TLWhGNKhsgLcw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yoGy1QNE2Mu684Dnt5kE0KR78Us42iBO7Ylk/ac8qXIR+hUEbCHKmwN13V33/CpAZ 7ZF/ngk8zOdA2EWJC7brJzzdg8AuEQrES2/z79Ujp/D4Cwl/4T1f0B1fcjFd+ys89e kWgXkxo58mDrsxSBwTp5IBzaoMTuQTb/+Xw8EPh8=
Importance: Normal
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thanks again Paul for the effort. The result does make sense now. The one-hour averages seem to show a slow trend towards negative (retarded) phase after 15 UT, which may be caused by decreasing solar illumination as the evening approaches.
 
Best 73,
Markus
 
 
 

Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.1, Sunday Mar 20


I wrote:

 > The phase doesn't look very steady Markus.

Markus wrote:

 > maybe the explanation is that with 10 minute averages my
 > signal is just too close to the noise.

You're right.   I confirmed this by injecting an artificial
carrier into the VLF recording at 8271.0025 at the same
average strength as your signal, then running this
signal through the same process.   The result looks very
similar.   Periods when your signal had crazy phase, so does
the artificial signal.    The standard deviation of the phase
is a little better on the artificial signal: 37 degrees
compared with 51 degrees, but that's to be expected since
your signal won't have an exact constant phase and amplitude.

Below is your signal in 30 minute measurements (555uHz)
stepping 15 minutes

  2016-03-20_12:00:00 0.10 fT  -75.5 deg
  2016-03-20_12:15:00 0.07 fT  -79.4 deg
  2016-03-20_12:30:00 0.07 fT  -77.6 deg
  2016-03-20_12:45:00 0.12 fT  -93.5 deg
  2016-03-20_13:00:00 0.10 fT  -87.1 deg
  2016-03-20_13:15:00 0.10 fT  -80.5 deg
  2016-03-20_13:30:00 0.12 fT  -68.8 deg
  2016-03-20_13:45:00 0.08 fT  -93.5 deg
  2016-03-20_14:00:00 0.08 fT -119.0 deg
  2016-03-20_14:15:00 0.11 fT  -81.1 deg
  2016-03-20_14:30:00 0.14 fT  -65.5 deg
  2016-03-20_14:45:00 0.15 fT  -66.1 deg
  2016-03-20_15:00:00 0.11 fT  -75.4 deg
  2016-03-20_15:15:00 0.02 fT -121.4 deg
  2016-03-20_15:30:00 0.07 fT -124.3 deg
  2016-03-20_15:45:00 0.13 fT  -91.9 deg
  2016-03-20_16:00:00 0.13 fT  -89.2 deg
  2016-03-20_16:15:00 0.13 fT -113.7 deg
  2016-03-20_16:30:00 0.10 fT -113.8 deg
  2016-03-20_16:45:00 0.08 fT -106.3 deg
  2016-03-20_17:00:00 0.09 fT  -95.2 deg
  2016-03-20_17:15:00 0.13 fT  -94.4 deg
  2016-03-20_17:30:00 0.09 fT -124.8 deg

Average -90.2 degrees, sigma 17.8 degrees and the artificial
signal has sigma 16.3 degrees at this setting.

One hour integration, 30 minute stepping

  2016-03-20_10:30:00 0.09 fT  -81.9 deg
  2016-03-20_11:00:00 0.12 fT  -78.4 deg
  2016-03-20_11:30:00 0.11 fT  -76.7 deg
  2016-03-20_12:00:00 0.09 fT  -75.9 deg
  2016-03-20_12:30:00 0.08 fT  -83.2 deg
  2016-03-20_13:00:00 0.11 fT  -76.9 deg
  2016-03-20_13:30:00 0.09 fT  -88.0 deg
  2016-03-20_14:00:00 0.10 fT  -83.7 deg
  2016-03-20_14:30:00 0.13 fT  -70.1 deg
  2016-03-20_15:00:00 0.08 fT  -93.6 deg
  2016-03-20_15:30:00 0.10 fT -101.9 deg
  2016-03-20_16:00:00 0.11 fT  -99.8 deg
  2016-03-20_16:30:00 0.09 fT -104.9 deg
  2016-03-20_17:00:00 0.09 fT -109.5 deg

14 degree sigma.
--
Paul Nicholson
--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>