OK, I admit that I was wrong. They have been in contact with ONE person
LA5VNA S
On 21-Mar-16 23:52, Geir Laastad [email protected] [rsgb_lf_group] wrote:
>
> Well, the simple answer is yes. I was indeed asked. So just to claim
that nobody was asked just because LA5VNA was not asked, is a premature
and wrong conclusion. Also, while at it. I for one, in general wouldn't
expect any organisation asking non-members which themselves have freely
distanced themselves away from the (any) organisation.
> RegardsGeir, LA6LU, LA2BCN
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Note Pro tablet.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Steinar Aanesland [email protected] [rsgb_lf_group]"
<[email protected]>
> Date: 21/03/2016 17:30 (GMT+01:00)
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon
I Interim
> Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016)
>
> " I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on
> 630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice? "
>
> The simplest answer is no, and this is one of the reasons that I am not
> a member of NRRL anymore.
>
> LA5VNA S
>
>
>
>
> On 21-Mar-16 10:48, Rik Strobbe [email protected]
> [rsgb_lf_group] wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna, 16-17 April 2016)
there is a proposal that concerns the 630 m band:
>>
>>
>>
>> It is recommended that beacons will be accepted in the plan of usage
of the 472 - 479 kHz band (630 m) in addition to the Recommendation
VA14_C4_REC_02: 476 - 477 kHz beacons – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz.
Maximum power output 1 W EIRP. Beacon proposals should adhere to beacon
recommendations in the IARU Region 1 HF Managers' Handbook, and should
be approved by the IARU Region 1 Beacon Coordinator (introduced by NRRL)
>>
>>
>>
>> Besides the fact that I am not a fan of the urge to put everything
into strict rules and I have doubts about the usefulness of beacons
(there are dozens of NDB's in and near the 630 m band), I do fear that
an "official" beacon band might attract people or clubs to put up a nice
"tech project" and leave us with the QRM.
>>
>> The targeted range (476-477 kHz) is de facto used for QRSS, a some
"wideband" CW beacons can cause a lot of harm.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on
630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice?
>>
>>
>>
>> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>
|
