Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I

To: "rsgb_[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016)
From: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:25:03 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
OK, I admit that I was wrong. They have been in contact with ONE person

LA5VNA S


On 21-Mar-16 23:52, Geir Laastad [email protected] [rsgb_lf_group] wrote:
>
> Well, the simple answer is yes. I was indeed asked. So just to claim that nobody was asked just because LA5VNA was not asked, is a premature and wrong conclusion. Also, while at it. I for one, in general wouldn't expect any organisation asking non-members which themselves have freely distanced themselves away from the (any) organisation.
> RegardsGeir, LA6LU, LA2BCN
>
>
> Sent from Samsung Note Pro tablet.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: "Steinar Aanesland [email protected] [rsgb_lf_group]" <[email protected]>
> Date: 21/03/2016  17:30  (GMT+01:00)
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim
>    Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016)
>
> " I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on
> 630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice? "
>
> The simplest answer is no, and this is one of the reasons that I am not
> a member of NRRL anymore.
>
> LA5VNA S
>
>
>
>
> On 21-Mar-16 10:48, Rik Strobbe [email protected]
> [rsgb_lf_group] wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna, 16-17 April 2016) there is a proposal that concerns the 630 m band:
>>
>>
>>
>> It is recommended that beacons will be accepted in the plan of usage of the 472 - 479 kHz band (630 m) in addition to the Recommendation VA14_C4_REC_02: 476 - 477 kHz beacons – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz. Maximum power output 1 W EIRP. Beacon proposals should adhere to beacon recommendations in the IARU Region 1 HF Managers' Handbook, and should be approved by the IARU Region 1 Beacon Coordinator (introduced by NRRL)
>>
>>
>>
>> Besides the fact that I am not a fan of the urge to put everything into strict rules and I have doubts about the usefulness of beacons (there are dozens of NDB's in and near the 630 m band), I do fear that an "official" beacon band might attract people or clubs to put up a nice "tech project" and leave us with the QRM.
>>
>> The targeted range (476-477 kHz) is de facto used for QRSS, a some "wideband" CW beacons can cause a lot of harm.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on 630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice?
>>
>>
>>
>> 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
>
>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016), Steinar Aanesland <=