To: | [email protected], "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016) |
From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:30:00 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444E5E57@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> |
References: | <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444E1924@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A444E5E57@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
" I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on
630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice? "
The simplest answer is no, and this is one of the reasons that I am not a member of NRRL anymore. LA5VNA SOn 21-Mar-16 10:48, Rik Strobbe [email protected] [rsgb_lf_group] wrote: Dear all, at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna, 16-17 April 2016) there is a proposal that concerns the 630 m band: It is recommended that beacons will be accepted in the plan of usage of the 472 - 479 kHz band (630 m) in addition to the Recommendation VA14_C4_REC_02: 476 - 477 kHz beacons – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz. Maximum power output 1 W EIRP. Beacon proposals should adhere to beacon recommendations in the IARU Region 1 HF Managers' Handbook, and should be approved by the IARU Region 1 Beacon Coordinator (introduced by NRRL) Besides the fact that I am not a fan of the urge to put everything into strict rules and I have doubts about the usefulness of beacons (there are dozens of NDB's in and near the 630 m band), I do fear that an "official" beacon band might attract people or clubs to put up a nice "tech project" and leave us with the QRM. The targeted range (476-477 kHz) is de facto used for QRSS, a some "wideband" CW beacons can cause a lot of harm. I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on 630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: bandplan proposal, Roman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: JT9 Activity right now, DK7FC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016), DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016), John Rabson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |