Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vien

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: bandplan proposal at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna,16-17 April 2016)
From: Lawrence Galea <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:19:18 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2OWjBllrlpTxMODgTZWmjDaz6QWgP19Ihc/yQLl5WnM=; b=cn7Vw7mS+iQsEwmjO9IkHSctXQDHC+Bwnjzcsdnk1yLsPNOaxTy02Gg+jCivPl3Hzb PIoqi/9fd1BGVbT52dojEvvEncvu71kvsgWB6mDgNd2uZ0wIdaYvRPjJH6Ibs2m3KnwF Ag3vPhJ7lBL/vSULzwNfTGGI3obWUeGNb3aSI34bM2LIN9hnoaMcYuoh08szYK8BO2Vy HwYx1u1JOTEczxj84DoRQC0DaSsXdEu2zinsn1FQnGFVALCuNg2FJan9D8VENsC2YH87 1j7/ARjOAdKirgTh1Yrzwx/1esde15hq1/kNw0tCssc8Z2/Jb0Z4GZDzvle1WgkRIiXL KyfQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Agree to push power up

On 3/21/16, DK7FC <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...instead of putting efforts in the definition of a band plan i suggest
> they focus on working to push the power limit by 10 dB upwards! That
> would be helpful.
> I bet, no one of those who want to decide where which mode can be used
> has ever been QRV, nor will ever!
> 73, Stefan
> Am 21.03.2016 10:48, schrieb Rik Strobbe:
>> Dear all,
>> at the next IARU Regon I Interim Meeting (Vienna, 16-17 April
>> 2016) there is a proposal that concerns the 630 m band:
>> */*/It/* is recommended that beacons will be accepted in the plan
>> of usage of the 472 - 479 kHz band (630 m) in addition to
>> the Recommendation VA14_C4_REC_02:  476 - 477 kHz beacons –
>> maximum bandwidth 200 Hz.  Maximum power output 1 W
>> EIRP.  Beacon proposals should adhere to beacon recommendations in
>> the IARU Region 1 HF Managers' Handbook, and should be approved by
>> the IARU Region 1 Beacon Coordinator/* (introduced by NRRL)
>> Besides the fact that I am not a fan of the urge to
>> put everything into strict rules and I have doubts about the
>> usefulness of beacons (there are dozens of NDB's in and near the 630 m
>> band), I do fear that an "official" beacon
>> band might attract people or clubs to put up a nice "tech project"
>> and leave us with the QRM.
>> The targeted range (476-477 kHz) is de facto used for QRSS, a some
>> "wideband" CW beacons can cause a lot of harm.
>> I wonder if NRRL consulted the few Norwegian hams that are active on
>> 630 m and if other in societies the band users were asked for advice?
>> 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>