Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WOLF Transmission

To: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:04:43 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=d6NJ63ilUPwSw+HrjS7pRFKt1bDGYHDR9mPQv4C8B7Y=; b=uh5Bo3e3KBvI1rIYLuE21CJUSPE5Dzyh3jep7Gat3NN36RuSd7IKCY1wvnf4IHy+ia cRt4EcWGqOBYT4whslZFa4AYC/Rd2b4ojb4m6FLyIniEgdourSrBu7AvAo3jI+Rg9Nv6 DPFv6cT2hrBfOeghRoT3QMW0FnhnSTfHlhBvjrMZXm+05kuT1bMvLPQEFJJ4EROsqC57 Jk1woiQK6zuC8zPPf5UDYzE5KOA+RyFmhp+o+pdvdHQdAgQha1F5t4vDc1Qsn21b9peI 8smjdQyC3EpeheFxBpsi99vfQhRSxN809fgQ1a+BWkwG/R5b1MwmBRbCkpa1agsWJkZC uJdg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAA8k23TxgpX_fLdeH8711sEuONWqg1eWXCHD+kHavOHo4+f-CQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
OK, moved to 137630 now

Andy

On 27 February 2016 at 19:56, Markus Vester <[email protected]> wrote:
Andy, if went to 137630 instead you'd be in a DCF39 gap, much clearer here. 137370 is also good.

73, Markus


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>; rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 8:45 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission

In that case...    and I also realise I did the calculations wrong and was in the  WSPR band:
I'll move up to just above it.

The transmission is now on 137650Hz

Mind you. 200 + 25Hz is a lot of allocation at LF  to call it all WSPR

Andy  G4JNT

On 27 February 2016 at 19:31, Markus Vester <[email protected]> wrote:
Mike's sequence ended at 19:16. Although somewhat more distant and weaker, there's also R7NT in your passband:

2016-02-27 19:18:06 R7NT    2060km 137540.999Hz   3mHz -49.3dBOp 100% 16.5dB
2016-02-27 19:16:53 G3XDV    843km 137542.569Hz   8mHz -30.8dBOp 100% 21.2dB
2016-02-27 18:18:06 R7NT    2060km 137540.940Hz   2mHz -41.9dBOp 100% 18.4dB
2016-02-27 17:18:06 R7NT    2060km 137540.945Hz   4mHz -48.7dBOp 100% 16.1dB

73, Markus 


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 8:23 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission

Ah, that is close. 
Is it still on?   I don't want to switch the transmission off to take a listen.

Andy

On 27 February 2016 at 19:05, Markus Vester <[email protected]> wrote:
The WOLF might have been in conflict with Mike's strong Opera signal:
2016-02-27 19:16:54 G3XDV    843km 137542.570Hz   4mHz -32.4dBOp  52% 20.0dB
 
73, Markus

 
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 7:56 pm
Betreff: Re: LF: WOLF Transmission

 
... watching. No joy yet, the first 52.8 minute round just ended with no meaningful result.
 
73 and good luck,
Markus (DF6NM)


-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>; rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Sa, 27 Feb 2016 5:27 pm
Betreff: LF: WOLF Transmission

And now for something completely different :

There is a WOLF transmission going out on 137540Hz, normal speed 10B/s
Only running about 30 watts of RF or roughly 10mW EIRP.

I'll be leaving it running for a while - at least until the 28V PSU too warm (it is a linear one and not terribly well heatsinked)

Andy  G4JNT




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>