| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonight |
| From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:06:53 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <CAC+C6w6QdeO9_Uon7k81kgyPwgmnrn8HSaZnsTgzpVd-UXm8cw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Very nice, a good result at about 70% of capacity for that carrier S/N. The 54% bit error rate is false, indicating part of the signal was missing, I guess there was some padding. This misleads the error calculation so that it comes up with crazy Eb/N0 like -7.9 dB. The 0.1dB calculated from the carrier strength is almost correct. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: hello!, ik0vve |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: XDV on 136.172 tonight TF-grabber, Halldór |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonight, DK7FC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut tonight, IZ7SLZ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |