To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ? |
From: | Mal Hamilton <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:16:12 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Can u hear any CW sigs around 474 at present Mal/g3kev Sent from my iPhone On 21 Dec 2015, at 18:29, "Trevor Smithers" <[email protected]> wrote: > Can I suggest that if you include cq, de or test, as well as your > callsign in the beacon string you will have a greater chance of being > picked up by any Reverse Beacon Nodes (RBN) that may be listening. > > cq cq cq de (callsign) or test test test de(callsign) should be enough to > trigger the system > > Just a thought > > 73 > Trevor G0KTN > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, Roberto IS0GRB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, Mal Hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, Trevor Smithers |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |