Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ? |
| From: | "Trevor Smithers" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:29 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) |
| Cc: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB2530A4FE@servigilant.vigilant.local> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Can I suggest that if you include cq, de or test, as well as your callsign in the beacon string you will have a greater chance of being picked up by any Reverse Beacon Nodes (RBN) that may be listening. cq cq cq de (callsign) or test test test de(callsign) should be enough to trigger the system Just a thought 73 Trevor G0KTN |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Dec 19 - 20 Best QRB/reports, Alex R7NT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, DK1IS |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, VIGILANT Luis Fernández |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: MF Christmas CW beacon ?, Mal Hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |