Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: VLF in VO |
| From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:39:57 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <0EF07ED4EE1B45BDBB86B44B855B03BF@gnat> <[email protected]> <68629D3DB5E840F098999D75247C9777@gnat> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
> About 30 watts were fed to a 5:1 XFMR and a ~0.35H > tuning coil to the 100m wire at 10m height. > The ERP was about 3uW. How about a long carrier, GPS or rubidium? It's a long shot but it's a low loss path and the time of year is good for several hours of coherent integration. I can easily see 10uW from 1000km in one hour over a path with a lot of land. West to east over water will be lower loss and four or six hours integration will make up for the lower ERP. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: [OT] CHU at QE37pd, edgar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: VLF in VO, Dimitrios Tsifakis |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: VLF in VO, jcraig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF in VO, Markus Vester |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |