Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: LF EbNaut test from JN80 on 137370

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: LF EbNaut test from JN80 on 137370
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:49:38 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Jj60g68Bc//mf8YyhxGbnIrOqwCDBplX0py0An0arwA=; b=OAfCUQyQqYs1kfEab0Cj7DD1urWLXctHVyDrLTTN+Ts0/2ApmxJol7PvvLPWRn1E4I w0pB68FtpSvmSGkOYEmV8uY9oEIlB7LZY2KAEDTf4LP87BQnMLoHM5Nn/GgxN18c4y/7 eW3Oka/yuaK5WGvJiOeAFcbiHeI4qBagZnPy+WM/pwJCusQOJZd29R1Kxr2CJnYLjNlr 22EClFsUjPsmmdWcUEReezljv8XB82oOmqmcXSy1k2tKgWfSHISGovoIxaLTJebdB94V +fxoLtegx81rls/SHG+epaCSEao2jqZ5E9FW4Tzg4dnMPaAGWZMfMho/GUdTysZyZoPl Nf/w==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RQGU=hgYNB0fQOh-HnU9B-ZCW6_Oki0RcWKBHDxksV7w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TqCUokxj9GoN0oPq9rbJWsS2w+-e8e0gCTReNNwzBmGg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RhRdjUvQKzL6i--44=6Nc9LLDZe2ZhGOwmcbzm7w74Qg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Yep, same here.
It feels correct: I = COS,  Q = SIN

'jnt


On 10 December 2015 at 20:34, Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> wrote:

In vlfrx-tools I use

 I = s(t) * cos( 2pi * Fo * t);

 Q = s(t) * sin( 2pi * Fo * t);

where s(t) is the incoming signal and Fo is the
local oscillator frequency.   Is that right, or
should there be a minus sign in there somewhere?

If s(t) is VO1NA at 137370.00000 and I set Fo to
137369.9, then when I put I and Q into EbNaut, it
needs an offset of +0.1 Hz to decode as you would
expect with the LO being 0.1Hz on the low side.

For more general mixing and frequency shift,
to select the upper sideband of the mixer output
I use

   I - j * Q

is that the right way round?   When I take I/Q data
from an RTL2832 I find I have to invert Q to get the
correct sideband, ie I + j * Q.   That's the only
independent source of I/Q signal that I have available
to try.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>