To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut test from JN80 on 137370 |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:34:43 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <CAA8k23RhRdjUvQKzL6i--44=6Nc9LLDZe2ZhGOwmcbzm7w74Qg@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RQGU=hgYNB0fQOh-HnU9B-ZCW6_Oki0RcWKBHDxksV7w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TqCUokxj9GoN0oPq9rbJWsS2w+-e8e0gCTReNNwzBmGg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RhRdjUvQKzL6i--44=6Nc9LLDZe2ZhGOwmcbzm7w74Qg@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
In vlfrx-tools I use I = s(t) * cos( 2pi * Fo * t); Q = s(t) * sin( 2pi * Fo * t); where s(t) is the incoming signal and Fo is the local oscillator frequency. Is that right, or should there be a minus sign in there somewhere? If s(t) is VO1NA at 137370.00000 and I set Fo to 137369.9, then when I put I and Q into EbNaut, it needs an offset of +0.1 Hz to decode as you would expect with the LO being 0.1Hz on the low side. For more general mixing and frequency shift, to select the upper sideband of the mixer output I use I - j * Q is that the right way round? When I take I/Q data from an RTL2832 I find I have to invert Q to get the correct sideband, ie I + j * Q. That's the only independent source of I/Q signal that I have available to try. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Upload reports, Mal Hamilton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut test from JN80 on 137370, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut test from JN80 on 137370, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: LF EbNaut test from JN80 on 137370, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |