Eric,
Am 24.08.2015 00:57, schrieb Eric NO3M:
Stefan
I think the decoder "sensitivity" is still the same, however, the
two-pass method employs signal subtraction on the second pass, removing
signals associated with stations decoded in the first pass. This
clears the way for stations that may have been missed in the first
pass, including stations close to a strong station or even stations on
the same QRG (as shown in my previous post). On average, I think there
are 10-15% (or more) decodes than with the standard decoder. It's
pretty crazy to decode two guys on the same offset that are 12-13 dB
different in SNR!
Thanks for the informations! I will test it!
If you run Linux [...]
Not yet. Just on my Raspberry. But it won't take to long any more...
73, Stefan
73 Eric NO3M / WG2XJM
On 08/23/2015 06:28 PM, DK7FC wrote:
Hi Eric,
Am 23.08.2015 21:51, schrieb Eric NO3M:
[...] WSJT-X (which also now includes WSPR with two-pass, signal
subtraction decoder by K9AN).
Does this have any advantage i.e. a better decode performance then
WSPR-X?
At
any rate... anxious for conditions to settle and start getting some TA
action.
A good idea!
I'm on air as well but i do not expect much this time of the year.
73, Stefan
|
|
