Stefan
I think the decoder "sensitivity" is still the same, however, the
two-pass method employs signal subtraction on the second pass,
removing signals associated with stations decoded in the first
pass. This clears the way for stations that may have been missed in
the first pass, including stations close to a strong station or even
stations on the same QRG (as shown in my previous post). On
average, I think there are 10-15% (or more) decodes than with the
standard decoder. It's pretty crazy to decode two guys on the same
offset that are 12-13 dB different in SNR!
The two-pass is the default decoder used in WSJT-X recent SVN code.
If you run Linux, grab a copy via SVN, compile and try it out!
There is a nice wsjtx-superbuild script that makes compilation very
easy, including pulling in the modified Hamlib3 source. I can post
the commands here if needed.
73 Eric NO3M / WG2XJM
On 08/23/2015 06:28 PM, DK7FC wrote:
Hi Eric,
Am 23.08.2015 21:51, schrieb Eric NO3M:
[...] WSJT-X (which also now includes WSPR with two-pass, signal
subtraction decoder by K9AN).
Does this have any advantage i.e. a better decode performance then
WSPR-X?
At
any
rate... anxious for conditions to settle and start getting some
TA
action.
A good idea!
I'm on air as well but i do not expect much this time of the year.
73, Stefan
|
|
