Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: Experiments - anyone? |
| From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:31:52 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <CAMFjj73OrK1LG3CNGHWOd8hiPdG_L-Q0Jj_kLpyLxOvdxGFE+Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Glad you found the problem Dex. Will look forward to another test tonight or soon. I'll try to put out my new E-field receiver this evening if I can finish some alterations quickly. It has much lower noise floor. I wrote: > PC needs reasonably good clock discipline (0.1 seconds or so) Probably 1 second is good enough because the symbol period would be at least 30 seconds (rate 1/8) or 15 seconds (rate 1/16). A good measurement of carrier S/N and phase will allow a suitable rate and timing to be selected. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | VLF: 8270 Hz, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: DD7PC OP32 LF, Scholz, Marco |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: Experiments - anyone?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Experiments - anyone?, Markus Vester |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |