To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: MF CW activity |
From: | John Langridge <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:31:06 -0800 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1415057466; bh=77gFh+8efpGdxjfef2cseh0frBB9P3CLyGIJ54hebxw=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZIcMSuKmmniPIfxv6XWuUfctsj5U2Fkle9Ak/mqz9lLrkeO/4ninKyhLwVqojCo19lOnKYwqpJj/xs3DqlpjItfV2Y7u0rCEWzDQXBtio81Xnk6JbW6hEATooBv5O+aPC6Zpzu8Fyw4vXlvpdY9CjIxeLnb6Hexnid77HHlgRIU= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Kudos Stefan! I agree 100%.. This same situation has been the case on 10m for a long time... open band but no one using it. Someone has to TX first! We showed that aural CW is quite viable all over NA this past weekend during our special event. Lots of reports from people that had
no idea it was possible on 630m CW or that 630m existed like in your situation. Now they know HI! 73! John WG2XIQ / KB5NJD From: DK7FC <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 7:25 AM Subject: LF: MF CW activity
Hi MF,
Just regarding CW activity on MF, below you can find another good example that (CW) activity rises activity. So if there is no one on the band, just call CQ, preverably with Q R O so that many stations can hear you, even those with local QRM and compromise antennas. First they must hear you, then they may start to improve their RX system and just then they will hear the QRP stations! Even if no one answers, the calls are not "a waste of energy and time". At least for me it's nice to know there are a few people outside catchinhg the signal, maybe even unintended :-) In that case, the OM didn't even know that the 630m band is existing for radio amateurs! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Forwarded email with kind permission by the author:
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: RE: opds LF & MF, Terry GW0EZY |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF CW activity, Steve |
Previous by Thread: | LF: RE: opds LF & MF, Terry GW0EZY |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: MF CW activity, Steve |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |