Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: ZEVS RX ant question, now success

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: ZEVS RX ant question, now success
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:34:10 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=zX/kcmSgOas+DNPA282DDUGBottsUgq3d7eXwFw+E1I=; b=UQJND5jtIYPjoSnFFXK1V9a9/Zd6G1QoQ5hVfBfwy/on8W7eMJUhhZuPfbpClYXIq1 gZQBug4KvupOSqwJKLXGObzdkdcLBgSGHRIgbni8NDWYHyW0jjT9yNSLaGdmln/hETDp XGnwYi0FAhYGH3P/tCLdbQR9EFoalllp5ScUjbGI2eMnn79acIonOh7eYF4H8sR5e1su 2H8MxAUD/1EAoZ2y14aV+yCePL4+Kv8RwvHQmZye3cu8ewykp8XZ5ZxoeBYEt+6EdU3i saNABwv93Ni39TPdrC+n89Yr1SQubLj/x0mATsp+Gt7hj1YTP3EYx/lMyajYQJ0BK49F PKNQ==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <1FEF5D3CDFAF4F5D9A31B0134D133FCF@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Thanks Wolf,

Yes, a good idea. I will try to catch it :-) But how do i know that it is the US mains instead of a 60 Hz monitor? Is the 60 Hz from the mains more stable?
I will work on the circuit and continue tomorrow.
Also i am curious about experiments near 2 kHz, now that i have a relatively clean RX site. I think about grounding the far end of my inv-L and run some 10A near 2 kHz. This vertical loop would have about 2100 m^2 beaming N/S. A RX loop could show some variation of the SNR due to the earth/ionosphere resonator...

73, Stefan


Am 03.10.2014 22:14, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Hi Stefan,

The 82 Hz signal looks good... you may even catch a glimpse of "DX" from the US and their 60 Hz mains with that setup.
It's several dB down on ZEVS but sometimes good copy here, on an active E-field probe out in the woods (far away from old PC monitors which sometimes operated near 60 Hz).

73,
  Wolf  DL4YHF .

Am 03.10.2014 21:38, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
Hi VLF,

This evening i received ZEVS for the first time in the garden :-)

I used nearly the same circuit than in my email below. However, i found that the J310 was damaged! Remembers me on the old discussion if protecting diodes are necessary or not :-) But this is a large antenna, compared to an active E probe like the PA0RDT-antenna...
Now i've replaced the JFET and added two 4148 protecting diodes on the gate against ground and plus.
Reception looks much better now:
0...24kHz: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/wide_500msperdiv_732mHzFFT_garden3rd.png
0...4 kHz: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/0...4kHz_500msperdiv_732mHzFFT_garden3rd.png
0...500 Hz: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/0...500Hz_500msperdiv_732mHzFFT_garden3rd.png
ZEVS in 7.6 mHz, 40 sec scroll rate: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/ZEVS_1st.png

It looks like i need some more gain on the lower frequencies. Will modify the circuit a bit...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>