Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:10:59 +0200
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3JTCATIpN4Dl2vNKCsx0pJKLenraQ48Kd9KLJsalQp8=; b=yib1lQP3Gy40x1BHcggtDuPQ5x6BkCvp4UfjzS8qCx8mdHNJGyWH5Nt7JhLJxIFZUO fYLrYEm7H/MGzKQGKmrzE2PRBQO2EB5FLxTyd51Ri726JDwXZgHShLLm4ZBcBd1Nu7AD 2lDt9DWeucbl/Lsi002p5dAFNIt92DBNWZlcqI1mc53VvlgJ6U3LEKDQUPH5SaCt6yhZ dKahWWKbreF8paqBOhH+aBluvpkv9BeDmv+ISIJ+NARJbhWPXMb2PsQ4eo7nu+XFkwGo naT+m4yhuRVwhe/RVbsIQT4IhyOaBxbSyv+h+oBh3gLrTXlBXlZpS5/EzzFWZ3BYZpro NpAg==
In-reply-to: <86E71FC3172F4E64A009D043A3ED486B@your91hoehfy9g>
References: <[email protected]> <3C5FBFC479F54BC790FCC6903E495096@gnat> <86E71FC3172F4E64A009D043A3ED486B@your91hoehfy9g>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
True true. But i fear it will happen again some day, due to several pseudo super features. NEW does not automatically mean BETTER, older OMs should know that. But obviously the advertisements are doing a great job. BTW, i remember the argumentation that the new features of yahoo will help to rise newcomers on the LF bands. But where are they now? Maybe in the web instead on the bands, but not even that!

73!

Am 29.06.2014 10:00, schrieb mal hamilton:
LF/MF
My advice from the beginning was not to get involved with Yahoo and stick to Blacksheep which I have always found to be totally reliable. Others like DK7FC agreed. Those shouting loudest for Yahoo at the time have all EXPIRED or FADED AWAY !!!!
I now rest my case
de Mal/G3KEV
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:56 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Fw: Black balled .... me?


Hi Pete we have been declaring for a long time now that we have no control over Blacksheep! So we could not "black-ball" you even if we should really want to :-))

There has been a long running problem with certain ISP Yahoo being one. In past years the majority of forged address spam came from Yahoo, gmail and others. The have now instituted some form of authorisation which causes a lot of their legitimate mail to be bounced by other sites.

You may remember before the Yahoo group was set up, and we still had access to the administator, that he implimented a facility which was available to check that mail was genuinely from the quoted address, the immediate result was mail from Yahoo, aol, gmail and a few other started bouncing because they wouldnt use the facility themselves....the blacksheep admin had to take it off again to allow normal operation. It now seems they are having so many complaints they have started using it or something similar and unmarked mails from blacksheep are being bounced by your Yahoo account!!...........or its something like that.

Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message ----- From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:37 PM
Subject: LF: Fw: Black balled .... me?



--- On Tue, 24/6/14, M0FMT <[email protected]> wrote:

From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Subject: Black balled .... me?
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 24 June, 2014, 19:31
Hi all
All my mails are coming back from Blacksheep and have done
for ages now. Have I been black balled on this reflector? I
don't mind but it would be nice to know and I won't bother
in future......}o(
Who knows????
73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>