Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 474kHz commercial signal

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 474kHz commercial signal
From: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:29:25 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
Hi Mike, LF,

I can't say that I have seen that signal but I will certainly look for it.

I have a similar signal on 136.160kHz at the moment which on this occasion started at 1701utc on 2/06/2014.
Also a little while ago the same/similar strength signal was on 136.500kHz for a few days.
I and others on the LF group suspected a mixing product with the very strong signal at my location on 81kHz.
During the long period of time (years) I have monitored 136kHz band I have not seen these signals before.
As far as I know nothing at my station has changed.

It was suggested the other part of the mix may be around 55kHz.
I am now monitoring the area round that frequency to see if any Tx's stop & start at the same times.

I would be interested if anyone else has seen these signals.

See my grabber.
73, de Gary - G4WGT
                            
MF-LF-VLF Grabber : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html
Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/index.html

.
On 03/06/2014 10:20, Mike Dennison wrote:
I presume this has been discussed before and I missed it.

What is the origin of the quite strong, wide RTTY-like signal on 
474.0kHz? It appears to be commercial as it is on continuously, and 
it comes up after dark every day.

For a while I presumed this was a funny on my receiver, but it 
appeared on another receiver with different architecture, and also on 
DK7FC's grabber. 

Mike, G3XDV
==========


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>