Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: DCF39 wide

from [Gary - G4WGT] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: DCF39 wide
From: Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:29:59 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
Mike,

Double check with HDSDR

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kwc100vvfqclzdg/Screenshot%202014-04-21%2015.26.25.png

Crashes not coincident with DCF data.
73, de Gary - G4WGT
                            
MF-LF-VLF Grabber : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/grabber2.html
Web : http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/index.html

.
On 21/04/2014 14:43, Mike Dennison wrote:
Is it just me, or is the new modulation on DCF39 and its companion 
just below the 136kHz amateur band much too wide?

Not only is the band wiped out during the data bursts but I can see 
traces of them above 200kHz! I have attenuated my input and see no 
reduction, so I am assuming my receiver is OK? Of course, I could 
have a bad joint on the antenna. Does anyone else see this very wide 
splatter?

Mike, G3XDV
==========

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: DCF39 wide, Gary - G4WGT
Next by Date:  LF: DCF39 wide, Mike Dennison
Previous by Thread:  LF: DCF39 wide, Mike Dennison
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: DCF39 wide, Gary - G4WGT
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]