Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: WSQ2 daylight test anyone ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: WSQ2 daylight test anyone ?
From: "Eberhard v.Wedelstädt" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:30:37 +0100
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121216 Icedove/3.0.11
Hi Wolf

the -22dB is the result from reducing the power 700 mW to 100 mW

73 and tu fer QSO
Eberhard

Am 16.03.2014 16:47, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
> Hi Steinar,
> 
> Not really too late - I am still transmitting occasionally.
> 
> It was interesting to see how different DL3ZID's signal was during the
> early afternoon:
> SNR between -10 and -22 dB (with noise normalized for with the somewhat
> arbitrary 3 kHz bandwidth).
> 
> Will send a number of 'diddles' (alternative idle tones, at the lowest
> and highest WSQ symbol frequency); this may give an indication about how
> many dBs are missing. The 'long FFT' should be selected (in the new
> version) for this test, because the reduced FFT bin width also helps to
> see weak signals in the spectrogram.
> 
> 
> 
> 73,
>   Wolf  DL4YHF .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Am 16.03.2014 16:22, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
>> Ok, it seems that I am too late ;)
>> LA5VNA S
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>