To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSQ tests |
From: | Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:44:14 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Hi all I have been to a local HAM meeting, but my radio with wolf's algorithm has captured this : cq cq de "wk f5wk f5wk + k cq cq pz "wer:qq f5ljk@v K cq cq rre "wk wo5wk fd~wkxcdp on 474.200KHz LA5VNA S On 24.02.2014 20:45, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > Good activity on 474.2 "USB dial" + 1 kHz audio in WSQ at the moment. > > Saw / had a short contact with : F5WK, DD7PD, IZ7SLZ. > Busy modifying WSQ here.. just received: > >> de iz7slz >> ge wolf i saw ur spot >> cul after dinner > > Ok Domenico, your signal looks much cleaner tonight then yesterday. > The signal is not stronger, but almost no 'dispersion' (if that explains > the smeared effect on the waterfall), and error free copy. > > Not sure if this is software-related (WSQ symbols falling into the > center of an FFT frequency bin or at the borders), or if this is an > ionospheric effect. > > 73 and cul, > Wolf DL4YHF . > > > > > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: Lemon transmissions, schaefer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: OP/OPDS tonight 137.547..., Bob Raide |
Previous by Thread: | LF: QRSS qso de SV8CS, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios |
Next by Thread: | LF: DF5QG calling XBand 630m - 80m, Marco |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |