Hi Steinar,
It would be very interesting to compare JT9-1 against WSQ2... and for
that purpose, using a common "dial" frequency (474.2) would allow
listeners to monitor two (or even more) modes, WSQ2, JT9, JT65, WSPR
with only one receiver and only one soundcard / PC.
So far, only funny looking thin white worms are creeping over the screen
here.
Btw, I'm not so convinced about the superiority of WSQ2 over the block
modes, and cannot understand the argument why FEC (and a bit of
redundancy in a block code) doesn't help. Maybe just a lack of insight
on this side, but sure it's fun to try and compare. Thanks for the
pointer and the test.
73,
Wolf DL4YHF .
Am 12.02.2014 21:51, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
Well, I will use "LA5VNA/B" first to see if someone can copy me at all..
LA5VNA S
On 12.02.2014 21:42, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
Hi all
I will be calling CQ on 473.2 in WSQ2 this evening.
LA5VNA S
On 12.02.2014 21:02, Chris wrote:
Hi All LF,
Anybody know what frequencies on 472kHz and 137kHz band to monitor for anybody
trying the WSQ mode?
Thanks, 73, Chris, G4AYT.
|
