To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: RE: WSQ Frequencies? |
From: | wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:35:06 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <89DADEA5A2EE4F52900427FF9563DD31@IBM7FFA209F07C> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCE5E13@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> <CE8CC4B0CD5F464B90D572CBCC1BBFB5@IBM7FFA209F07C> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Ok, there is a steady carrier just inside the two red lines, which seems
to disturb the decoder.
Maybe the software should have an automatic notch against steady
carriers like these (don't know, maybe it has one).
Will keep watching, I guess the signal will improve later (or the big guns go to sleep, hi). Running 120 Watts here, ERP somewhere between 0.5 and 1 watt. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . Am 12.02.2014 22:27, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: I got 100% LA5VNA S |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: RE: WSQ Frequencies?, wolf_dl4yhf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: RE: WSQ Frequencies?, wolf_dl4yhf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RE: WSQ Frequencies?, Steinar Aanesland |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RE: WSQ Frequencies?, Steinar Aanesland |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |