LF: RE: Re: De F6CNI : Test WSQ

[Rik Strobbe <Rik.Strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>]

Hi Domenico,

 

I copied you earlier this evening on 474.2kHz dial and replied to your CQ.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

From: ing.lindo

Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:09 PM

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Subject: Re: LF: Re: De F6CNI : Test WSQ

 

Good evening to all.

Wol, f i want try a qso . What is the freq.   now?

 

73 Domenico iz7slz

 

 

Inviato da Saturn 3S.90 with okitex

-------- Original message --------
From: wolf_dl4yhf
Date:13/02/2014 22:17 (GMT+01:00)
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: De F6CNI : Test WSQ

Hello Marco,

Thanks for the info. Indeed the QSB is deep now; Andy F6CNI just went up to easy 'audible' copy and then went back into the noise but still printed about 90% in WSQ2.
Do you also have permanent 'carriers' in the WSQ frequency range in Italy (and elsewhere) ?
Suggestions also from others about a preferred frequency range for this QSO mode ?

Here, the carrier on 478.404 kHz is now so strong that i can see 'modulation sidebands' (which may also be the effect of a 'pumping' AGC) up to 20 Hz above and below it... so just outside the decoder's audio frequency range when the RX is at 477.3 kHz in USB.

73,
  Wolf DL4YHF




Am 13.02.2014 22:02, schrieb Marco Cadeddu:

Hi Wolf,

 

copied a couple of your cq and now partial copy...

GL de Marco IK1HSS

---

Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection Antivirus avast! est active.