To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA |
From: | Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:53:13 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Hello Joe, thank you for your kind words!Still struggling here with my local Pest DCF39. Between 03:15 and 04:40 UTC DCF39 was sending a higher pulse frequence. That is the reason of the higher noise level at that time and poorer reception of your beacon. Thank you for your signal! 73 Hartmut Am 2014-01-10 13:26, schrieb [email protected]: Hello Hartmut and Group, Even with only 65 watts from the TX, strong QRSS100 signals were seen on Hartmut's grabber at 137.777 so the power was cut to <10 watts by reducing the drain voltage of the class E amp to 12 V. The grabber traces faded substantially, but rebounded to clearly readable around 0630 utc. Congrats on your impressive RX setup, Martmut! 73 Joe VO1NA |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 74 Khz who?, Victor van Kooten |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR-15 tonite, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA, jcraig |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA, jcraig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |