Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA |
| From: | Hartmut Wolff <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:53:13 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Hello Joe, thank you for your kind words!Still struggling here with my local Pest DCF39. Between 03:15 and 04:40 UTC DCF39 was sending a higher pulse frequence. That is the reason of the higher noise level at that time and poorer reception of your beacon. Thank you for your signal! 73 Hartmut Am 2014-01-10 13:26, schrieb [email protected]: Hello Hartmut and Group, Even with only 65 watts from the TX, strong QRSS100 signals were seen on Hartmut's grabber at 137.777 so the power was cut to <10 watts by reducing the drain voltage of the class E amp to 12 V. The grabber traces faded substantially, but rebounded to clearly readable around 0630 utc. Congrats on your impressive RX setup, Martmut! 73 Joe VO1NA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 74 Khz who?, Victor van Kooten |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR-15 tonite, Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA, jcraig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA, jcraig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |